Meta Data#
Difficulty: medium First Attempt: 2026-05-17 Source: Day 23 learning note
Study Context#
This article is rebuilt from the exact LeetCode section in the learning note. I kept the note’s repair points, comparison points, and common mistakes, while removing unrelated non-LeetCode material from the same day.
Related Reminders From The Note#
- derive
LC 714fromhold/cashand explain where the fee is charged
Learning Note Extract#
Problem 2 - LC 714 Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock with Transaction Fee#
- Pattern: 2-state stock DP with transaction cost.
Why This Fits#
The legal actions are the same as unlimited transactions:
- keep holding or buy
- keep cash or sell
The only change is:
every completed transaction pays a fee
So the state model stays simple, but one transition absorbs the fee.
Core State / Invariant#
hold = best profit after day i while holding one stock
cash = best profit after day i while not holding stock
Transitions#
Charge the fee on sell:
hold = max(previous_hold, previous_cash - price)
cash = max(previous_cash, previous_hold + price - fee)
Equivalent formulations can charge on buy instead. The important thing is consistency.
Complexity#
Time: O(n)
Space: O(1)
Common Mistakes#
- subtracting the fee on both buy and sell
- mixing two equivalent formulations and double-charging
- calling it greedy without explaining the state meaning
- updating
cashfrom an already-updatedholdinstead ofprevious_hold
Strong Spoken Explanation#
This is still a hold/cash state machine. The fee does not create a new legal state; it only changes the economics of selling. So I keep the same two-state model as Stock II and subtract the fee in the sell transition. That keeps the recurrence clean and the interpretation stable.
Implementation Warning#
When writing the rolling version, preserve previous-day values explicitly:
prev_hold = hold
prev_cash = cash
Then update from those previous states, not from already-mutated same-day values.
Clean Solution#
The note above captures the reasoning and the mistakes to avoid. The implementation below is the version I would submit.
from typing import List
class Solution:
def maxProfit(self, prices: List[int], fee: int) -> int:
hold = -prices[0]
cash = 0
for price in prices[1:]:
hold = max(hold, cash - price)
cash = max(cash, hold + price - fee)
return cash
Complexity#
Time O(n), Space O(1).
Mistakes To Watch#
- Subtracting the fee on both buy and sell.
- Using cooldown logic; there is no cooldown here.
Final Interview Explanation#
Start from the state definition, then explain why the transition preserves that state. If there is a loop direction, state compression, or a similar-looking problem with a different answer shape, call that out explicitly because that is where this problem family usually breaks down.
